American Photo · May/June 98
by Russell Hart
As chief photographer for Rolling Stone and US magazines, Mark Seliger performs a delicate visual balancing act. It's his job to make his famous subjects--the musicians, actors, and other artists of 1990's pop culture--look as good as their reverential public demands. But Seliger also wants to make interesting photographs. "I want my pictures to have an element of surprise," he explains. "At the same time, I can't be so edgy that the people I'm expected to photograph are reluctant to work with me." For Seliger, the best way to accomplish both goals is to make portraiture a collaborative venture with his subject.
For his ethereal image of Fiona Apple, which ran on a 1998 Rolling Stone cover, Seliger's idea was to echo a line from the pop diva's song "Sullen Girl": "But it's calm under the waves/In the blue of my oblivion." (Seliger always immerses himself in a subject's work, watching an actor's films or listening to a musician's recordings before planning a shoot.) After he got the blessing of Rolling Stone's editors, Seliger had to convince Apple to submerge herself in a 4x8-foot custom-built Plexiglass tank of water. Apple was in the middle of a big tour, and, as Seliger recalls, "she was understandably worried about getting her ears clogged or coming down with something." Fortunately, Seliger's human aquarium was heated, and when the Los Angeles tap water proved to cloudy, a filtering system was installed--though then the water became too clear. Solution: Clay was added to diffuse the strobes aimed through the bottom of the tank.
Why are artists like Apple willing to go along with Seliger's sometimes outlandish ideas? "They're usually picture-savvy," says the photographer. "They know my work, and they know I won't do anything that makes them look foolish." In fact, part of Seliger's strategy is to make the shoot "an experience and an event" for the subject. And he tries to establish a personal rapport. (With Apple, a shared fascination with spiders helped.) "As it is, I sometimes have a sense of trepidation about how things will turn out," Seliger says.
|"And if I just go in
there thinking I'm there to do a photo shoot, I fail miserably. But when I have a
chance to get to know the person, and have some laughs with them, I do much better
work." Good chemistry pays off in other ways. "Though I always start by
planning everything out, I've learned that the best pictures happen organically,"
Seliger is philosophical about the meaning and artistic endurance of his magazine work. "I don't worry about having a style," he says. " And I try not to think about whether a picture will last past an issue. I think about whether the picture is going to have an impact at that particular time. I see myself as a visual entertainer."
ON LIGHTING The most successful lighting is lighting you don't even think about when you look at the picture. I think lighting technique should be unobtrusive. I never think, "This lighting is really going to make this photo." Basically, I use all different types of lighting--we run Polaroid tests to see which type suits a particular setup. For a given session, we might have three different setups, with three different types of lighting.
ON STARS An artist is really putting a lot on the line when he or she agrees to be photographed, so you have to be respectful. You can't just have a "This is my idea, love it or leave it" attitude. But for many of my pictures, I really do ask my subjects to extend themselves, and I'm constantly amazed at how willingly they do it. On the other hand, sometimes you get good old-fashioned rock-and-roll attitude, and that can work for you too. I remember photographing Liam Gallagher of Oasis blowing smoke through his nose; when I asked him to do it for a second take, he said, "You got the shot," and that was that.
ON FILM I'm no longer caught up in the idea that everything has to be on chrome. We're shooting print film more and more, and I'm learning how and when it can be used to our advantage. Print film really plays into my need to work freely. When you're shooting print film, unlike chrome, you don't have to constantly take a new meter reading every time the subject moves away from the light or the sun goes behind the clouds. And I find that print film is softer in quality than transparency film, which for many pictures is better. We used mostly print film for the Fiona Apple shoot, and the prints were much more beautiful than the chromes--muted and creamy and a little fantastic in feeling. fin
[RennYman, thanks for typing it!]